Issue 16

15 volunteers rescued a horse. What about the injured person?

Practical PIO analyzes real social media posts to help you improve your communications. All identifying details are blurred or removed because our goal is growth, not criticism.

A vehicle hit a horse and carriage, sending both into a creek bed. Fifteen volunteers responded, freed the horse from its harness, and removed the carriage from the water while EMS cared for the injured person. The volunteer effort is impressive and worth recognizing—but the release never tells readers what happened to the patient, leaving the most important question unanswered.

Full text

Here’s the full text so you can follow along (or in case the image doesn’t load):

✅ What works well

✅ Covers the 5Ws + H. The post includes who (15 volunteers from [Fire company]), what (horse and carriage collision), when (dispatched at 4:40 p.m., cleared at 5:17 p.m.), where ([Road] in [Township]), why (motor vehicle collision), and how (freed horse, removed carriage).

✅ Concise and focused. The release stays on topic without unnecessary detail. It’s short, readable, and tells what the fire company did without wandering into other agencies’ responsibilities.

✅ Highlights the volunteer response. Mentioning that 15 members signed in for the call shows the community how many neighbors volunteered their time to help. This is an important part of the volunteer fire company story.

✅ The timestamps tell a story. Dispatched at 4:40 p.m., cleared at 5:17 p.m.—that’s 37 minutes of volunteer time in the middle of the day. For volunteer departments, showing this time investment helps the community understand the commitment.

✅ Stays in its lane. The release focuses on what the fire company did (freed the horse, removed the carriage) and acknowledges that EMS handled patient care. It doesn’t overstep into medical information.

✅ Knows its audience. Horse and carriage collisions aren't unusual in this response area—local readers know these calls can be serious. The release appropriately focuses on the response rather than treating the incident as novelty for outsiders.

🛠️ What could be improved

Big picture

🛠️ Stay in your lane—but complete the story. The release mentions an injured person but never says what happened to them. Were they transported? Were injuries life-threatening or minor? How did they get out of the creek bed—was the patient ambulatory, or did firefighters help move them before EMS took over? Staying in the department’s lane is good, but that doesn’t mean leaving readers hanging. Say “EMS transported the patient to [Hospital]” or “The patient was treated for non-life-threatening injuries” (citing EMS or police if needed). If there’s an EMS post about the incident, link to it.

Nitty gritty

🛠️ Skip the dispatch-style opening. “Time out 16:40 - MVC/ Horse and Carriage” is dispatch notation that alienates neighbors. Incorporate that information naturally: “Firefighters responded at 4:40 p.m. Saturday to a motor vehicle collision involving a horse and carriage.”

🛠️ Eliminate firefighter jargon. “W/5” and “W/4” refer to staffing numbers (5 and 4 firefighters respectively) that may not mean much to general readers. The important number is the total (15 members)—the individual apparatus staffing is internal detail. Also, “first in units” is fire service terminology; say “arriving crews.”

🛠️ Follow AP Style. “Volunteers” doesn’t need to be capitalized. Follow AP Style: lowercase for common nouns. Also, “16:40” and “17:17” should be “4:40 p.m.” and “5:17 p.m.” While the 24-hour format shows the time commitment, AP Style is more accessible to general readers.

🛠️ The math doesn’t add up. Three apparatus with 5, 5, and 4 members equals 14, not 15. Did someone respond in their privately owned vehicle? Either explain this or make sure the numbers match.

Practical PIO version

Here’s a version that closes the loop and uses neighbor-friendly language:

Teaching note: Notice how this version leads with the action (volunteers free horse) rather than dispatch notation. It acknowledges what happened to the patient without overstepping into medical diagnosis—either by citing EMS or directing readers to the appropriate agency. The timestamps are in AP Style but the time investment (37 minutes) is calculated for readers. Most importantly, all three elements of the rescue are addressed: the horse, the carriage, and the person.

How do you balance staying in your lane with giving readers a complete picture? Do you coordinate with EMS or police to share patient or investigation information? Hit reply and tell me—I read every email.

Thanks for reading!

Did someone forward you this email? Subscribe here.

If you’re already a subscriber and you found value in something here, tell your friends and colleagues to subscribe!

Tool update

The Practical PIO beta remains open for testing. If you signed up for beta access but haven’t tried it yet, I’d love your feedback—even if it’s just plugging in a past incident to see how it works.

If you haven't tried it yet, I'd love to know what's holding you back— reply to this or email John@PracticalPIO.com and tell me.