A fire alarm at 3:55 a.m.—and there was actually a fire


Issue 10

A fire alarm at 3:55 a.m.—and there was actually a fire

Practical PIO analyzes real social media posts to help you improve your communications. All identifying details are blurred or removed because our goal is growth, not criticism.

You responded to a fire alarm at 4 a.m. and found an actual fire. The sprinkler system worked exactly as designed. Everyone stayed safe, and the damage was minimal. That’s a great story—but it’s buried under layers of technical detail that will lose most of your readers.

Full text

Here’s the full text so you can follow along (or in case the image doesn’t load):

At approximately 3:55AM this morning, [City] Fire Department units were dispatched for a Commercial Fire Alarm, with Smoke & Water Flow alarm activations at the [Business] of [City], located [Address].
Upon arrival, the first arriving Engine Company reported moderate smoke visible within the building and forced entry was authorized and gained through the front door. The buildings fire sprinkler system had activated and was flowing. Engine 2 personnel made interior entry and located the seat of the fire area in a display area near the floral arrangement area of the back of the store.
Additional responding units were FD-1, Engine-1, Rescue-12, [City] PD & [County Hospital] EMS
Crews quickly extinguished remaining fire and the deactivated the fire sprinkler system to minimize water damage. They then performed ventilation to remove remaining smoke from the building.
Upon initial investigation, the fire is determined to be accidental in nature, and appears to have been caused by an electrical short in an extension cord which was being utilized in a Christmas Decor display area. The fire was contained/confined to a very small area, with only two sprinkler heads activating to help suppress the main area of the fire.
[Business]’s management are currently working to handle cleanup and restoration efforts as quickly as possible to minimize the store closure time, and hope to re-open for regular business early next week.
There are no injuries to report from this incident.

✅ What works well

The 5Ws + H are covered. We know who ([City] Fire Department), what (fire), when (3:55 a.m.), where (business and address), why (an alarm was going off), and how the fire started (electrical short).

The cause is clearly explained. The post identifies the electrical short in an extension cord used for Christmas decorations as the cause.

The sprinkler system success story is included. Noting that only two sprinkler heads activated and contained the fire demonstrates how these systems save buildings and lives.

🛠️ What could be improved

Big picture

🛠️ Don’t miss out on teachable moments. The post mentions the sprinkler system’s success and the extension cord as the fire cause, but it stops short of giving the reader actionable tips like “Leave at least 18 inches of space around sprinkler heads” or “Don’t overload extension cords.”

🛠️ Stay in your lane. This is a fire department news release, not the business’s. First responders shouldn’t speak for the business owner. When the business fails to reopen next week, first responders don’t want to be on the hook.

🛠️ When the timing tells part of the story, you can adjust the structure. A fire at 3:55 a.m. in a closed business probably means no customers or employees were at risk. Leading with “no injuries” is usually right, but here the release can weave it into the narrative naturally—closed business, sprinklers worked, fire stayed small, everyone safe. The timing is part of why this story has a good outcome.

🛠️ Translate fire service operations for civilians. “Forced entry was authorized and gained,” “seat of the fire area,” “performed ventilation”—these are operational terms that mean little to the public. Say “broke through the front door,” “found the fire,” and “cleared smoke from the building.”

🛠️ Too much detail overwhelms the message. Readers don’t need to know which engine company arrived first, that personnel “made interior entry,” or the exact location within the floral area. Focus on what matters: alarm came in, fire was real, sprinklers worked, minimal damage.

Nitty gritty

🛠️ Watch your capitalization. “Commercial Fire Alarm,” “Engine Company,” “Christmas Decor” don’t need capital letters (aside from Christmas). Follow AP Style: lowercase unless it’s a proper name or precedes someone’s name.

🛠️ Proofread for typos and errors. “the deactivated” should be “then deactivated.” “The buildings fire sprinkler” needs an apostrophe: “building’s.” Small mistakes like these undermine credibility.

🛠️ Use consistent time format. “3:55AM” should be “3:55 a.m.” in AP Style—lowercase with periods and a space before “a.m.”

🛠️ Avoid redundancy. “At approximately 3:55AM this morning” is redundant—“a.m.” already tells us it’s morning. Just say “at 3:55 a.m.”

🛠️ Fix awkward phrasing. “Located the seat of the fire area in a display area near the floral arrangement area” uses “area” three times in one phrase. Say “found the fire in the floral department” or “in a Christmas display near the flowers.”

Practical PIO version

Here’s a version that tells the story clearly and highlights what matters most to your community:

A fire alarm at [Business] turned out to be the real thing early this morning—and the sprinkler system did exactly what it’s designed to do.
Firefighters responded to the alarm at 3:55 a.m. and found smoke inside the closed store at [Address]. The building’s sprinkler system had already activated. Crews broke through the front door and found a small fire in a Christmas display in the floral department, caused by an electrical short in an extension cord.
Only two sprinkler heads activated, containing the fire to a very small area. Firefighters put out the remaining flames and cleared smoke from the building. No one was injured.
This is why sprinkler systems matter. They save buildings and lives by controlling fires before they spread. And if you’re using extension cords for holiday decorations, make sure they’re in good condition and rated for the decorations you’re powering.

Teaching note: Notice how this version leads with the noteworthy angle (alarm = actual fire, sprinklers worked) and tells the story in language anyone can understand. The prevention message at the end connects this specific fire to actionable advice readers can use. You’ve educated your community without overwhelming them with operational minutiae.

What would you have done differently? Hit reply and let me know—
I read every email.

Thanks for reading!

Did someone forward you this email? Subscribe here.

If you’re already a subscriber and you found value in something here, tell your friends and colleagues to subscribe!

The beta is live

If you're on the waitlist, check your email for your “magic link” to beta.practicalpio.com. Not on the waitlist yet? There's still room.

If you haven't tried it yet, I'd love to know what's holding you back—reply or email John@PracticalPIO.com and tell me.

Practical PIO

Are you a firefighter, medic, police officer, or emergency manager who got “voluntold” into the PIO role? Get weekly breakdowns of real emergency services social media posts: what’s working, what could be better, and practical tips you can use immediately. Written by a fellow first responder.

Read more from Practical PIO
Screenshot of a social media post with text and photos of the incident scene. Full text of the social media post follows in the newsletter.

Issue 9 Great safety stats. But what should your neighbors DO about it? Practical PIO analyzes real social media posts to help you improve your communications. All identifying details are blurred or removed because our goal is growth, not criticism. You’ve got a preventable fire, a clear cause, and powerful safety statistics. You’ve done exactly what good PIOs do—use an incident to educate your community. This post was this close to nailing it. It just needed to take one more step: telling...

Screenshot of a social media post with text and photos of the incident scene. Full text of the social media post follows in the newsletter.

Issue 8 Big fire. No injuries reported. So why is it in paragraph 4? Practical PIO analyzes real social media posts to help you improve your communications. All identifying details are blurred or removed because our goal is growth, not criticism. You’re writing about a challenging fire response, and you want your community to understand what your crews faced. This release does a solid job explaining the operational challenges—but there’s an opportunity to make it even stronger by focusing on...

Screenshot of a social media post with text and photos of a meeting with the senator. Full text of the social media post follows in the newsletter.

Issue 7 When recognition tells a story — and leaves one untold Practical PIO analyzes real social media posts to help you improve your communications. All identifying details are blurred or removed because our goal is growth, not criticism. Public recognition posts aren’t incident updates. They’re reputation builders. They show the community who the department values, what kinds of actions it celebrates and how teamwork looks under pressure. This post recognizes a firefighter for public...